Aeilts's alleged inexperience provides no excuse for his violation of this rule. Id. The fact that some clients were ultimately successful in their legal proceedings does not justify the stress that they endured during the attorneyclient relationship with Fisher. The commission recommended Aeilts's license to practice law be suspended for six months. Weather related closures Wednesday, February 22, 2023, Archived Supreme Court Opinions Prior to 2017, Archived Court of Appeals Opinions from 1/10/2018 to 2/7/2018, Archived Court of Appeals Opinions from 2017 and Earlier, How to Become a Qualified Court Interpreter in Iowa, Information for Current Court Interpreters, State Court Administration Organizational Chart, Submission of CLE Programs by CLE Sponsors. Suggestions for avoiding problems include: Some people are dissatisfied with lawyers because they have unrealistic expectations. Ct. Att'y Disciplinary Bd. In summary, we conclude Aeilts violated rules 32:8.4(b), 32:8.4(c), and 32:8.4(d). so that C.B.W.s current spouse could adopt L.M. Fisher later revealed Hallett's outstanding legal fees in a publicly viewable online exchange. Lawyers are required to be reasonably prompt and to keep clients reasonably informed. Cases involving false statements have a wide range of sanctions. If you change your mind about the legal matter, keep the lawyer informed. Fisher's posttrial brief and brief regarding sanctions asked us to consider his mental health issues in determining an appropriate sanction. Ct. Att'y Disciplinary Bd. Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board Respondent William Wayne Ranniger Attorney for the Complainant Allison A. Schmidt Attorney for the Respondent John C. Gray Supreme Court Oral Argument Schedule Non-Oral Sep 15, 2022 9:30 AM Supreme Court Opinion Opinion Number: 22-0796 Date Published: Oct 14, 2022 v. Schmidt, 796 N.W.2d 33, 40 (Iowa 2011) (omission and alteration in original) (quoting Iowa Sup. Further, the messages were not unlike requests for leniency and a quick disposition an attorney might ask for any other client. Ct. Att'y Disciplinary Bd. Therefore, we agree with the commission's and the Board's recommendations that Aeilts's license should be suspended for six months. The Grievance Commission is made up of members that are geographically and gender-balanced. v. Kieffer-Garrison, 951 N.W.2d 29, 38 (Iowa 2020) (holding the court generally subjects attorneys who actively disregard this fundamental baseline [of honesty] to sanctions ranging from six-month license suspension to revocation); Beauvais, 948 N.W.2d at 518 (suspending lawyer for three months for falsely claiming to the court and opposing counsel that his client had accepted a settlement and misrepresenting to his client that she would be punished by the court if she did not sign the settlement agreement). A relatively inexperienced Iowa attorney had too much on his plate and, as a result, missed court deadlines and appearances. WebI. Tara van Brederode, Lawrence F. Dempsey IV, and Crystal W. Rink (until withdrawal), for appellee. His actions reveal a disrespect for the law and law enforcement. Ct. Att'y Disciplinary Bd. Ct. Att'y Disciplinary Bd. Their Finding of Fact and the entire record of the proceeding are reviewed de novo by the Iowa Supreme Court. v. Blessum, 861 N.W.2d 575, 591 (Iowa 2015). Fisher's legal practice showed a clear pattern of misconduct across several clients. You should consult with an attorney to protect your legal rights and determine the nature of your legal responsibilities. IOWA SUPREME COURT ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD, Appellee, v. Andrew Gatton AEILTS, Appellant. Aeilts completed eight years of service in the Armed Forces, which we consider a mitigating factor. The record does not indicate Fisher's conditions directly caused the violations in the complaint. He has no prior discipline, which we also consider a mitigating factor, though we give this factor little weight because his misconduct began shortly after he was admitted to the bar. The commission granted the motion for sanctions. Honesty is the hallmark of the legal profession. Fisher failed to complete various aspects of the discovery process and delayed hiring an appraiser to appraise a family farm. A division of the Grievance Commission of the Supreme Court of Iowa filed a report recommending that we suspend Gailey's license to practice law in Iowa for thirty days. v. Muhammad, 935 N.W.2d 24, 38 (Iowa 2019)). 32:3.4(d) (diligence with regard to discovery). A lawyer should not represent more than one client in a matter unless both consent after full disclosure by the lawyer. WebThe first is the Attorney Disciplinary Board. The court placed Aeilts on supervised probation for one year, imposed a civil penalty, and required Aeilts to complete fifteen hours of unpaid community service. Id. Ct. Bd. Cornelison denied making any threats against Aeilts and provided a recording of the conversation as proof. Ten of the cases were OWIs, and he represented other clients in a range of charges from criminal trespass to drug possession. Nor does Committee on Professional Ethics & Conduct of The Iowa State Bar Association v. Ramey, 512 N.W.2d 569 (Iowa 1994) (en banc), help Aeilts's case. The record does indicate several times where Fisher directly apologized to testifying witnesses about their previous interactions and that he voluntarily dismissed a small claims judgment against Hallett. Click here for the Board's current informational brochure. Rule 32:8.4(b) prohibits a lawyer from commit[ing] a criminal act that reflects adversely on the lawyer's honesty, trustworthiness, or fitness as a lawyer in other respects. Iowa R. Prof'l Conduct 32:8.4(b). WebIowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Michael D. Kozlik Annotate this Case Download PDF Search this Case Google Scholar Google Books Legal Blogs Google Web Bing Web Google News Google News Archive Yahoo! County Attorneys are answerable to the voters, not the Board, for their exercise of charging discretion. 844 N.W.2d 456, 46263 (Iowa 2014). Fisher pursued a custody modification action in September and then a termination action in November. Finally, Aeilts cooperated with the Board, which is a mitigating factor. The Board is not a collection agency. Tara van Brederode, Lawrence F. Dempsey IV, and Crystal W. Rink (until withdrawal), for appellee. Clients, such as A.H. and C.B.W., strongly indicated either in emails, texts, or online reviews how Fisher's neglect or abandonment negatively affected the relationship with their children and their own mental health. When determining whether a lawyer violated rule 43:8.4(c), we focus on whether the effect of the lawyer's conduct is to mislead rather than to inform. Haskovec, 869 N.W.2d at 560. WebAttorney Discipline Complaint Against a Lawyer As part of its responsibility to supervise lawyers and in the interest of promoting public confidence in the legal system, the Iowa Supreme Court has procedures for addressing complaints concerning alleged violations of the Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct. The second is the Grievance Commission. Pursuant to Iowa Court Rule 35.11(2), the Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board was granted permission to appeal from the findings and recommendations of the Grievance Commission concerning alleged disciplinary rule violations by the respondent attorney. at 68283. In lawsuits, disputes about the facts are resolved by the courts. The second is the Grievance Commission. A lawyer may violate rule 32:8.4(c) when he fails to disclose a material fact. Iowa Sup. We reject Aeilts's arguments that his misrepresentations to the court were not knowing or intentional but due to his negligence and incompetence. If the Board decides to dismiss your complaint, you will be notified in writing. The Boards jurisdiction extends to the attorneys license alone. Aeilts requested that harassment charges be brought against Cornelison and sought a no-contact order. But Aeilts's conduct was not limited to a three-week timeframe; Aeilts misrepresented his professional experience to the court during his allocution over a year after he made the false police report. Click here for the Board's current informational brochure. Introduction. The Iowa Supreme Court has granted immunity to anyone who files a complaint or gives testimony with regard to a complaint. Fisher hired a process server but either lost or never obtained proof of service. at 338 (quoting Iowa Sup. Aeilts committed multiple rule violations involving conduct from two unrelated events. Inaccurately recalling a client's presence at a hearing two years prior is a far cry from inaccurately recalling one's own experience and the types of cases worked on. In Rhinehart, we determined that rule 32:3.3 target[s] only the conduct of an attorney while serving as an advocate representing a client. Id. Ct. Att'y Disciplinary Bd. by April 5, 2020. Complaints about lawyers not paying bills are resolved in the courts of Iowa. All Rights Reserved. He stopped regularly meeting with a psychiatrist in March 2017 but still takes medication. Ct. Att'y Disciplinary Bd. 22-1646 Decided: January 20, 2023 Waterman, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which all justices joined. The Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board brought a complaint against the respondent, John W. Gailey, alleging multiple violations of our ethical rules. v. Stoller, 879 N.W.2d 199, 212 (Iowa 2016) (quoting 7A C.J.S. IOWA SUPREME COURT ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD, Appellee, v. Andrew Gatton AEILTS, Appellant. Instead, we take into consideration the totality of facts and circumstances in each case. Although Aeilts sent Robinson several text messages, Robinson did not intervene in Aeilts's pending OWI case. The ADB can dismiss meritless complaints and can issue certain types of discipline. A. Iowa Rule of Professional Conduct 32:8.4(b). It is physically and operationally separate from the Attorney Disciplinary Board. at 571. The following flow-chart shows the steps involved upon the filing of a complaint with the attorney disciplinary board: The Grievance Commission does not get involved in an attorney disciplinary matter unless and until the ADB has filed a formal complaint of charges against an Iowa lawyer. The Board is not funded by the taxpayers of Iowa. We briefly summarize the commission's factual findings surrounding the ethics violations. Ct. Att'y Disciplinary Bd. In Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. McGinness, we found an attorney violated rules 32:8.4(c) and 32:8.4(d) when he falsified the certificate of service on civil discovery requests he failed to send to opposing counsel and then doubled down to the point of hiring a handwriting expert to support his insistence he had not copied the certificate from another filing when confronted. v. Casey, 761 N.W.2d 53, 5961 (Iowa 2009) (per curiam) (suspending lawyer for three months for misrepresenting the marital status of the decedent of an estate on court and tax documents); Iowa Sup. We suspend Andrew Aeilts's license to practice law with no possibility for reinstatement for six months. IOWA SUPREME COURT ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY BOARD, Complainant, v. Curt N. DANIELS, Respondent. This misconduct amounted to a concerning amount of continuances, contempt charges, and the hiring of several new attorneys. at 78385. Ct. Att'y Disciplinary Bd. 21-0774: Quality Plus Feeds, Inc. v. Compeer Financial, FLCA Filed Jan 13, 2023 View Opinion No. 21-0774 After telling Officer Donelson about Cornelison's alleged threats, he specifically requested that harassment charges be brought against Cornelison. Whether Aeilts was requesting a simple misdemeanor harassment charge or an indictable harassment charge, he still made misrepresentations to the police with potentially serious criminal consequences for Cornelison. We typically impose a longer suspension where there is harm and multiple violations. We revoked Postma's license. What are the unpredictable factors? The Grievance Commission chair appoints a panel of 4 lawyers and 1 lay member who hear the testimony and evidence regarding the alleged misconduct. Recognizing the potential for someone to not have perfect recollection of an event, we remarked that the inability of a person to accurately recall an event does not necessarily lead to the conclusion that the person's inaccurate recollection is an expression of dishonesty or deceit. Id. Aeilts argues that prior cases involving frivolous filings are more comparable to his case. 45.2(3)(a) (complete records of funds and other property). This suspension applies to all facets of the practice of law as provided in Iowa Court Rule 34.23(3), and Fisher must notify any remaining clients as outlined in Iowa Court Rule 34.24. State of Iowa, ex rel., Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General of Iowa. The parties are also bound by stipulated facts in reference to their subject matter and in light of the surrounding circumstances and the whole record. Nine, 920 N.W.2d at 828 (quoting Iowa Sup. Ct. Att'y Disciplinary Bd. Aeilts maintains that he did not intentionally make false statements to the court, relying on Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Sobel, 779 N.W.2d 782 (Iowa 2010). After the Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board (Board) filed a complaint against the attorney, the parties reached a stipulation of facts, violations, and sanctions. Iowa Sup. In Khowassah, we found an attorney violated rule 32:8.4(b) when he committed his second OWI and rule 32:8.4(c) because he kept military leave pay that he was not entitled to receive. The disciplinary and complaint process is funded by an assessment on all lawyers admitted to the practice of law in Iowa. If a client is damaged by a lawyers negligence, another lawyer should be consulted as to whether legal action should be brought in court. Copyright 2023, Thomson Reuters. WebAttorney Discipline Complaint Against a Lawyer As part of its responsibility to supervise lawyers and in the interest of promoting public confidence in the legal system, the Iowa Supreme Court has procedures for addressing complaints concerning alleged violations of the Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct. Ct. Att'y Disciplinary Bd. v. Watkins, 944 N.W.2d 881, 893 (Iowa 2020). No. 32:1.16(b)(1) and 32:1.16(d) (proper withdrawal). at 572. Based on these violations, the commission recommended a suspension of one year. In Ramey, we held that a prosecutor's statement to the district court that he personally checked the serial numbers on the bills he was offering as an exhibit with the serialized list was a misrepresentation in violation of DR 1102(A)(4), the precursor to rule 32:8.4(c). We agree with the commission's legal conclusions based on our analysis of the record. 21-1799 Decided: May 13, 2022 Oxley, J., delivered the opinion of the court, in which all justices joined. The record is filled with examples of clients or opposing counsel sending several emails asking for updates or questions on their cases, as well as many follow-up emails, texts, or calls that went unanswered. The Board recommends a six-month suspension, while Aeilts asks for thirty days. There are several present here. After Curry terminated the representation and hired a new attorney, Fisher engaged in a drawn out dispute with Curry and the new attorney over whether Fisher would give Curry's client file to the new attorney. v. Said, 953 N.W.2d 126, 155 (Iowa 2021) (holding attorney's representation of an underserved population is a mitigating factor). The Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board filed a complaint against the respondent, James S. Conroy, alleging he violated the Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct. Get a free directory The Board is responsible for receiving and initiating ethics complaints against attorneys whose practice falls within the Boards jurisdiction. We need not decide whether Aeilts intentionally misled the court. v. Cunningham, 812 N.W.2d 541, 553 (Iowa 2012) (determining we will not view a lawyer's prior discipline as an aggravating factor when the conduct occurred during the same timeframe as the current violation before the court). An analogous OWI disciplinary case is Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Khowassah, 837 N.W.2d 649 (Iowa 2013). Curt N. Daniels, Chariton, (quoting Iowa Sup. Ct. Att'y Disciplinary Bd. Fisher and the Board did not contest the commission's legal conclusions. Ct. Att'y Disciplinary Bd. There is no temporal overlap to mitigate Aeilts's conduct, and we reject his argument to the contrary. 22-1646: Iowa Supreme Court Attorney Disciplinary Board v. Curt N. Daniels Filed Jan 20, 2023 View Opinion No. served or submit service by publication through the Des Moines Register, resulting in several continuances of the case. We recognized that [l]awyers cannot be excused for false statements on the basis of a sloppy, or even casual, unawareness of the truth. Id. The law will make inferences as to a lawyer's knowledge with those considerations in mind. This standard is more demanding than proof by a preponderance of the evidence but less demanding than proof beyond a reasonable doubt. Id. Write to confirm all important understandings. Resolve claims of ineffective assistance of counsel or violation of constitutional rights in a criminal proceeding. He or she is also better educated than most people, more sophisticated and more sharply sensitized to the legal implications of a situation. Jan 13, 2023 View opinion no v. Muhammad, 935 N.W.2d 24 38... No possibility for reinstatement for six months falls within the Boards jurisdiction extends to the.! Van Brederode, Lawrence F. Dempsey IV, and 32:8.4 ( b ) are in... Withdrawal ), and Crystal W. Rink ( until withdrawal ), for their exercise of discretion. Practice showed a clear pattern of misconduct across several clients ( complete records of funds and other property ) than! Aeilts violated rules 32:8.4 ( c ), 32:8.4 ( c ) when fails! Proof by a preponderance of the court have a wide range of charges from criminal trespass to drug possession ). Specifically requested that harassment charges be brought against Cornelison and sought a no-contact order Some people are dissatisfied with because! On his plate and, as a result, missed court deadlines and appearances informed... We take into consideration the totality of facts and circumstances in each case Aeilts completed eight years of in... Analysis of the case to drug possession novo by the lawyer informed for reinstatement for six.... Text messages, Robinson did not intervene in Aeilts 's Conduct, and we reject his argument to attorneys. Anyone who files a complaint or gives testimony with regard to a.... To keep clients reasonably informed is harm and multiple violations but due to his case harassment charges brought! And multiple violations 's legal conclusions based on these violations, the messages were knowing! Suggestions for avoiding problems include: Some people are dissatisfied with lawyers because they have unrealistic expectations months... One client in a publicly viewable online exchange: may 13, 2023 View opinion no our analysis the. 38 ( Iowa 2014 ) v. Blessum, 861 N.W.2d 575, 591 ( Iowa 2013 ) Aeilts! Whose practice falls within the Boards jurisdiction state of Iowa, ex rel., Thomas J. Miller, Attorney of! Contempt charges, and Crystal W. Rink ( until withdrawal ), 32:8.4 ( )... Board decides to dismiss your complaint, you will be notified in writing 45.2 ( 3 ) a! This rule court were not knowing or intentional but due to his.... Intentional but due to his case license alone client in a matter unless both consent after full disclosure by Iowa..., 879 N.W.2d 199, 212 ( Iowa 2013 ) to protect your legal rights and determine the of! A range of sanctions both consent after full disclosure by the taxpayers Iowa. Other property ) inexperience provides no excuse for his iowa attorney discipline cases of this rule rule... Reject Aeilts 's pending OWI case Des Moines Register, resulting in several continuances of record... Rule violations involving Conduct from two unrelated events keep the lawyer types of discipline, which! The taxpayers of Iowa appellee, v. Andrew Gatton Aeilts, Appellant standard is demanding... An Attorney might ask for any other client with an Attorney to protect legal... Continuances, contempt charges, and he represented other clients in a matter unless both consent full... The DISCIPLINARY and complaint process is funded by the lawyer informed unlike requests for leniency and quick! And provided a recording of the case ask for any other client diligence with regard to discovery ) of.... An Attorney might ask for any other client suggestions for avoiding problems include: Some people are with... Finding of Fact and the entire record of the discovery process and delayed hiring an appraiser to a! Missed court deadlines and appearances Aeilts argues that prior cases involving false statements have a range... Legal responsibilities Oxley, J., delivered the opinion of the discovery and... Consider a mitigating factor Attorney might ask for any other client might ask for any other client receiving and ethics. Files a complaint and law enforcement summary, we take into consideration the totality facts. A publicly viewable online exchange submit service by publication through the Des Moines Register, resulting in several continuances the... No possibility for reinstatement for six months the legal matter, keep the lawyer of a situation and (... Proof of service in the complaint lawsuits, disputes about the legal implications of a.. Commission is made iowa attorney discipline cases of members that are geographically and gender-balanced that misrepresentations. Proceeding are reviewed de novo by the Iowa Supreme court Attorney DISCIPLINARY Board a amount... With those considerations in mind unlike requests for leniency and a quick disposition Attorney. Free directory the Board is responsible for receiving and initiating ethics complaints against attorneys whose practice falls within the jurisdiction... And gender-balanced a clear pattern of misconduct across several clients Iowa rule of Professional Conduct 32:8.4 ( ). A six-month suspension, while Aeilts asks for thirty days for six months the facts are resolved the... Than one client in a criminal proceeding Hallett 's outstanding legal fees in a matter unless consent. Andrew Aeilts 's alleged threats, he specifically requested that harassment charges be brought against Cornelison and sought no-contact... Cornelison and sought a no-contact order Attorney General of Iowa 1 lay member who hear the and. Multiple rule violations involving Conduct from two unrelated events educated than most people, more sophisticated more. Factual findings surrounding the ethics violations constitutional rights in a iowa attorney discipline cases viewable online exchange has granted immunity anyone! V. Blessum, 861 N.W.2d iowa attorney discipline cases, 591 ( Iowa 2019 ) ) criminal. Legal conclusions based on these violations, the commission 's legal conclusions based on analysis. Charges be brought against Cornelison and sought a no-contact order may violate rule 32:8.4 ( )! 3 ) ( diligence with regard to discovery ) we need not decide whether intentionally. 2022 Oxley, J., delivered the opinion of the court Iowa Sup, delivered the of! Court deadlines and appearances reviewed de novo by the courts not unlike requests for leniency and a quick an. Complaints and can issue certain types of discipline a concerning amount of continuances, contempt charges, and 32:8.4 b! But less demanding than proof beyond a reasonable doubt complaint, you be! 'S recommendations that Aeilts 's license to practice law be suspended for six months missed court deadlines appearances. ) ) Dempsey IV, and 32:8.4 ( c ), for appellee Lawrence F. IV! Of 4 lawyers and 1 lay member who hear the testimony and evidence regarding the alleged misconduct )! Fisher 's legal conclusions based on these violations, the commission 's conclusions! Custody modification action in September and then a termination action in November or violation of constitutional rights a. Of constitutional rights in a range of charges from criminal trespass to drug.! ( diligence with regard to a complaint suspension of one year in mind longer suspension where there harm. All justices joined were OWIs, and we reject his argument to the voters, not the 's. Attorney DISCIPLINARY Board, which is a mitigating factor Prof ' l 32:8.4... A lawyer may violate rule 32:8.4 ( c ), and the Board did not in... Of several new attorneys he stopped regularly meeting with a psychiatrist in March 2017 but still medication! Of a situation Thomas iowa attorney discipline cases Miller, Attorney General of Iowa the totality of facts and circumstances in case! With lawyers because they have unrealistic expectations sent Robinson several text messages, Robinson not. Board recommends a six-month suspension, while Aeilts asks for thirty days v. Khowassah, 837 N.W.2d 649 ( 2015! Across several clients an analogous OWI DISCIPLINARY case is Iowa iowa attorney discipline cases court DISCIPLINARY. The Board decides to dismiss your complaint, you will be notified in writing the court, in all. Practice falls within the Boards jurisdiction extends to the practice of law in Iowa in! Andrew Gatton Aeilts, Appellant violations, the commission 's factual findings surrounding the ethics.. Your mind about the legal implications of a situation eight years of service in Armed. Involving false statements have a wide range of sanctions conversation as proof revealed Hallett 's outstanding fees! Messages were not knowing or intentional but due to his negligence and incompetence to case. Aeilts requested that harassment charges be brought against Cornelison and sought a no-contact order Aeilts requested that harassment charges brought... Those considerations in mind Crystal W. Rink ( until withdrawal ), 32:8.4 ( b ), J. delivered! The Board 's current informational brochure submit service by publication through the Des Moines Register, resulting several! Those considerations in mind, 38 ( Iowa 2019 ) ) that cases. Not decide whether Aeilts intentionally misled the court, in which all justices joined to practice be! On our analysis of the evidence but less demanding than proof beyond a iowa attorney discipline cases doubt N.W.2d 199, 212 Iowa... Exercise of charging discretion, for appellee prior cases involving false statements have a wide range of.. Novo by the courts of Iowa Miller, Attorney General of Iowa, ex rel., Thomas J.,... Takes medication hear the testimony and evidence regarding the alleged misconduct and gender-balanced totality of facts and circumstances in case! Provides no excuse for his violation of this rule bills are resolved by the of! Committed multiple rule violations involving Conduct from two unrelated events the courts of Iowa whose practice falls the! Suspension, while Aeilts asks for thirty days, as a result, court. Making any threats against Aeilts and provided a recording of the proceeding are reviewed de by! At 828 ( quoting Iowa Sup in each case that his misrepresentations to the contrary to mitigate 's. Keep the lawyer an assessment on all lawyers admitted to the attorneys license alone the... J. Miller, Attorney General of Iowa, ex rel., Thomas J. Miller, Attorney General of,., 920 N.W.2d at 828 ( quoting Iowa Sup responsible for receiving and ethics!, 2023 Waterman, J., delivered the opinion of the record does not indicate fisher 's posttrial brief brief!